Securitization

Subscribe to Securitization via RSS

On October 20th at the Charlotte City Club, Dechert partner David Harris spoke on an ASF Sunset Seminar panel titled “FDIC’s Final Securitization Safe Harbor – Understanding the New Rules.”  I won’t spend too much time on the background of the FDIC’s Old Safe Harbor Rule but will tell you that the Transitional Safe Harbor Rule continues to have a place even though we have a New Safe Harbor Rule (adopted on September 27, 2010), because the New Safe Harbor Rule extends the Transitional Safe Harbor Rule so that transfers of assets into securitizations made on or prior to December 31, 2010 are permanently grandfathered and not subject to the conditions of the New Safe Harbor Rule.  Following?
Continue Reading Securitizations: An Old Rule, a Transitional Rule and a New Rule (and we’re not talking Good, Better, Best)

I am on a Halloween kick right now – it’s the elections. I hear Zombies are popular this year.  Zombies indeed.  Do you ever think this could be a deeply sophisticated and sly commentary on our GSEs?  How droll.  They are scary.  How about that for a segue.

The private securitization market for residential mortgages is still dead (like Generalissimo Franco) and the GSEs, attached to a fire hose of taxpayer money, continue to fuel 90% of the United States housing market.  But they are insolvent. What apparently worked so brilliantly for twenty-five years is breathtakingly broken.  Call me silly, but I don’t think we’ve got a sustainable model here.  The good news is that no one else seems to think we have a sustainable model either.  There was a symposium at the Federal Reserve last week on the future of housing finance.  I don’t think a lot of progress was made.  I was passingly concerned to see that almost all of the talking heads were academics.  That demographic may be really good at some things; my guess is not so much at rebirthing a functional housing finance market. It struck me as more can kicking.  When in doubt, talk.  Wonk-filled symposiums give birth to papers, not markets.Continue Reading GSEs: The Night of the Living Dead

Last week the FDIC approved its final Safe Harbor Rule regarding securitization. That something that sounds so good could be so bad leaves you thinking: can’t we catch a break in trying to repair this damaged economy? To set the stage a bit, the FDIC has a suite of powers, while acting as conservator or receiver of an insured depository institution (“IDI”), to affirm or repudiate contracts and claim or recover property of the IDI. When a failing IDI securitizes financial assets, these powers allow the FDIC to undo the transaction and re-acquire those assets. The possibility that a securitization would be undone by the FDIC is an existential problem for any proposed securitization. But never fear. So long as a transaction meets all the conditions for sale accounting under GAAP, the transaction is proof against the exercise of those powers. Even better, there is a Safe Harbor! Sounds simple, right?Continue Reading FDIC: Mining a Safe Harbor

The final day of ABS East in Miami closed on Tuesday late afternoon and we’re back home with no suntans.

Those of us who didn’t overdo it on Monday evening (we won’t mention names) started Day 3 at a panel discussion titled “Lessons from the Financial Crisis: Required Steps for Rebuilding the Investor Base and Future Sources of Liquidity.”

Talking about RMBS, the consensus is that the economics just aren’t working for issuers, let alone the other impediments to getting deals done these days. Current interest rates on jumbo mortgage loans are too low. Over the next six months, however, at least one panelist thinks spreads will come in and the dearth of alternative investment grade securities that are attractive to investors will help the RMBS sector.

One panelist said that too much leverage cracked the world economy and if institutions become so highly levered again, it will happen again. Insofar as regulations are concerned, many of us agree with him that it is irresponsibility that needs to be regulated.
 Continue Reading ABS 2010 Concludes With High Winds and Little Sun

Dechert attorneys kicked off ABS East by hosting a Day 1 cocktail party at the Fontainebleau that was well attended by our friends and clients.

Day 2 of ABS East is underway. The Monday opening panel– Restoring Confidence and Rebuilding the Industry: The Role of Securitization– drew a pretty full house.

The general consensus is that the regulatory bodies are in the way and will cause delay in the recovery of the securitization market. I won’t go so far as to claim it wasn’t broke and didn’t need some fixing, but it’s clear the fixing to come is going to take a while. Without definitive rules, potential issuers can not evaluate the cost to enter the market. If we had a more targeted response to our problems from Congress and the regulators we could avoid this delay.

On the resi front, clearly the GSEs have crowded out private issuance, which has been facilitated by Congress and the Fed. Whereas commercial real estate found a natural bottom, the feeling is that resi never did. And, as one panelist put it, "distressed loans continue to pose a lingering cloud preventing meaningful recovery." The question was posed as to why there was nothing much after Redwood in the resi space. Again, the GSEs are dominating that space. Conforming loan limits have never been higher and it’s increasingly more difficult to even qualify for a jumbo loan under current underwriting criteria. With CMBS, it’s possible to get a reasonable number of loans. RMBS requires many more loans and there’s competition for the best loans.Continue Reading Live From the ABS East

We’re looking forward to ABS East October 3-5. More than 2,200 attendees are expected to gather at the Fontainebleau Miami Beach to discuss current topics in securitization.  Hot topics this year include Lessons from the Financial Crisis, Restoring Confidence and Rebuilding the Industry, the Role of Securitization in Revitalizing the Economy, Assessing the Changing Face…

Last week, the Supreme Court of the State of New York handed down a decision in the battle between CWCapital, representing the senior mortgage debt as special servicer, and Pershing’s andWinthrop’s joint venture, who recently bought the mezz debt in this transaction at a deep discount.  Everyone knows what’s going on here.  The mezz debt was bought as a lever to attempt to get control of the property through, or in the shadow of, bankruptcy.  A successful workout would, by definition, compromise the senior debt.  To prevent that, CW sought injunctive relief to prevent the foreclosure of the mezz debt and they got it.  Unless this is reversed, it’s game over for the mezz because the foreclosure of the mortgage debt is coming up very soon. Continue Reading The Stuy Town Wars

The gestation of CMBS 2.0 continues apace. A slow pace. The bulk of the deals look an awful lot like CMBS 1.0, but at least one, the Goldman/Citi deal, seemed to come right out of the playbook of the activist investment grade ad hoc committee that has been fulminating for fundamental change in the structure of CMBS. The Goldman/Citi deal saw a B buyer without customary rights to terminate the special servicer, bondholder voting mechanics to remove the special servicer, a consulting ombudsman for the investment grade classes, and constrained special servicer compensation. To say the least, the industry’s notion of what CMBS 2.0 ought to look like has not gelled and will probably continue to see innovation and tinkering for some time to come. Certainly, the industry has yet to absorb whatever risk retention FinReg will bring us as well as possible changes in the structure of representations and warranties and perhaps something to reflect enhanced underwriting.

The talk on the street is that the investment grade buyers responded very well to the Goldman/Citi structure. At the end of the day the structure will follow the money.

So it’s a good time to pause for a minute on the rush to the new structure. Is the new structure, so adamantly pursued by segments of the investment grade marketplace, really an unalloyed good?Continue Reading Careful What You Wish For…

As a follow up to my earlier post, we just issued this article (pdf) about the IRS’ recent Revenue Procedure (pdf) regarding the REMIC rules. The problems inherent in last September’s REMIC Regulations have been well-covered in this blog. In short, the IRS surprised the industry by requiring a mortgage loan to pass an 80% value-to-loan test as a condition to any lien release (the same test required upon initial contribution to the REMIC). While the existing REMIC Rules could have been read to only expressly permit releases of property in connection with a qualifying defeasance, the pervasive view among issuers and their counsel for years was that certain releases (outparcels, condemnation, and partial releases upon pay-down, to name a few) were permissible so long as the release was at the option of the borrower and was subject only to certain objective criteria.Continue Reading REMIC Rules Provide “Safer” Harbor for Releases