2012

Recently, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals brought smiles to the faces of many lenders (especially Bank of America, the appellee and secured lender) when it refused to combine the assets of related debtors without a substantive consolidation order and held that a single asset real estate debtor will be treated as a single asset real estate debtor.Continue Reading If It Looks Like a Duck, err, a SARE Debtor…

Recently, several courts have published decisions interpreting the rights granted to mezzanine lenders under intercreditor agreements – I’ve recently co-authored this Dechert OnPoint detailing the cases. These decisions, in large part, follow the holding of the Stuytown decision (not great news for many subordinate lenders). Also, a recent decision from the United States Bankruptcy Court…

That great whooshing sound you heard a few weeks back may have been the air being sucked out of the room for thousands of warm bodies that penned recourse guaranties on (now) underwater loans during the market’s run-up. The cause: two recent cases coming out of Michigan (Wells Fargo Bank, NA v. Cherryland Mall and  51382 Gratiot Avenue Holdings v. Chesterfield Dev. Co.) sticking recourse guarantors with deficiency judgments on heretofore non-recourse loans based on the interplay of two fundamental tenets of CMBS lending – “bad boy” carve-outs and single purpose entity covenants.

Non-recourse lending is a lynchpin of American real estate finance. The lender is limited in the exercise of its remedies upon default to the collateral – for all intents and purposes, the Borrower gets a check at origination and a put at maturity should things go south. But there are limits – carve outs for fraud, selling the property, stealing rents, filing bankruptcy and other naughtiness will give the lender the right to look to the guarantor to make good on the loan.
 Continue Reading Pay Me My Money Down: Recourse Guarantors Pick Up the Tab in Michigan

The ASF 2012 Conference held last month in Las Vegas was a success by any measure and attracted an impressive number of attendees (4,500).  Attendees were happy to escape New York and other chilly locales and attend some great panel discussions on securitization, regulatory developments and mortgage servicing (or, for some, at least read about those panels the next morning on their iPhones while waiting to tee off).  The owners of the Aria will definitely be able to make their mortgage payment this month with all of the money left behind by ASF attendees. 

My Dechert colleagues and I who attended the Conference cover almost all of the securitized asset classes.  As I described in my blog from the Conference, your particular view of the Conference depends largely on what asset class you focus on in your practice – autos and CLOs, for example, look very strong.  As someone who spent unimaginable amounts of hours of my pre-credit crisis life drafting RMBS deal documents, I yearn for the return of the public RMBS deals  – and not just because I miss spending my days (and most nights) trying to describe in “Plain English” the waterfall on a multi-group negative amortization deal.  I truly believe that we can’t have a meaningful recovery in the housing market without the return of private-label RMBS.  But regardless of what particular asset type you follow, there was undeniably a lot of buzz surrounding a couple of topics. Continue Reading Leaving Las Vegas: Further Thoughts on the ASF 2012 Conference

We’ve been writing a lot recently about the likelihood that European banks and, to a lesser extent, U.S. banks would be strongly incented to sell assets to improve capital ratios. We had a client briefing in New York on the Eurobank crisis a few weeks ago. We brought together our North American and European regulatory and transactional counsel to cover a wide range of issues from the sale of assets to rescue capital. We had a lively conversation on the panel and with the audience about asset sales. It was pretty clear to one and all that if assets are not disintermediated, bankers will be defenestrated. Given the choice, we are pretty sure the banks will sell assets.

De-risking of banks’ balance sheets might be less than terrific macroeconomic policy at a time when economic activity is weak and could be very bad if it touches off a powerful credit contraction and a descent into a continent full of zombie banks. That’s bad. But, always look on the bright side of life, in a Life of Brian sort of way. In the short to medium run, the velocity of transactional activity around financial assets will go up. Indeed, we have been very busy since mid-year buying, selling or financing pools of loans bereft of the love of the bank who made ‘em.Continue Reading Learning to Love Disintermediation

The image of the cresting wave looming behind the dais in the Loews’ Americana Salon during Douglas Holtz-Eakin’s keynote address posed a central, if unintended, question that was addressed by more than one speaker during the three-day conference.  Are we riding a wave to recovery or facing a deluge of maturing debt?  For most of the 1,200 industry participants that occupied Miami’s South Beach for CREFC’s annual January conference last week, there seems to be no certain answer (other than almost unanimous agreement that South Beach is a better Winter destination than our Nation’s Capitol).Continue Reading CREFC January Conference Recap: Riding the Wave

Recently, the Wall Street Journal highlighted the arrival of “bad loan securities.” If this is a trend, and I both hope and think it is, we clearly have to get a better deal name for these than “Insert Bank Name”, Bad Loan Securities 2012-1. Securitization of less than ideal conduit product has been with us since the birth of securitization, but reached its apogee in the RTC series, for non-performing loans, in the early to mid 1990s. That transaction architecture is being revived, and it’s about time. Both Fitch and DBRS have published criteria, or at least guidance and the other agencies are beavering away, busy working with bankers to come up with workable ratings technology.Continue Reading The Return of the Liquidating Trust