Here is something helpful that has surfaced amidst the fallout, pain and confusion of the global COVID-19 crisis. The implementation date for the all-too-simple in theory but not-simple-at-all in practice CECL accounting standard has been pushed back by the passage of the CARES Act for banks until the COVID-19 national emergency declared by the president ends or December 31, 2020, whichever is earlier. In addition, an interim final rule released by the FRB, OCC and FDIC on Friday, March 27th, now provides an option to delay the effects of CECL on regulatory capital for two years (in addition to the original three-year transition period for banks required to adopt CECL during their 2020 fiscal year). Banks opting to use both forms of relief would be subject to a modified transition period which would be reduced by the amount of quarters CECL was delayed due to the CARES Act. No relief was provided for non-banks who are otherwise required to follow CECL.
Continue Reading CECL: The Ugly Pig Running Out of Lipstick
Office of the Comptroller of the Currency
Risk Retention and Stockholm Syndrome
After three years of waiting, we now have our Risk Retention Rule. All six of the Agencies responsible for the Rule – the FDIC, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, the Department of Housing and Urban Development, the Federal Housing Finance Agency and the SEC – have finally managed to agree, albeit with significant dissent at the FDIC and the SEC, on a Final Rule. Note that Richard Cordray of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (in Progressive Causes) …er…the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, apparently had a heavy finger on the scales, which is why there was material dissent at the FDIC and SEC. So, after all those years of waiting, we have “it.” “It” of course is another five hundred some odd pages of commentary and bloviating and a relatively few pages of actual Rule which, as we study it more, will inevitably have left much that will need to be subsequently clarified. We have already found technical inconsistencies between the commentary and the Rule.
Continue Reading Risk Retention and Stockholm Syndrome