According to the Boston Globe, the owners of Boston’s signature office building – the John Hancock Tower – have begun marketing a significant stake in the building.  Many will remember that the Hancock Tower represented one of the Great Recession’s first large-scale mezzanine foreclosures, falling in late 2008/early 2009 when a joint venture comprised of Normandy Real Estate and Five Mile Capital acquired the building via mezzanine foreclosure.  As other industry players were “extending and pretending”, the team from Normandy/Five Mile did their homework, called the borrower’s bluff and bought themselves a building.  And now it looks like it may be paying off.

By accurately predicting the building’s value and strategically purchasing mezzanine debt at the rights levels, the joint venture was able to seize control of the mezzanine stack and force foreclosure.  The master stroke – using mezzanine controlling holder rights to de-lever a bloated (and hugely complicated) mezzanine capital stack, while keeping attractively low-priced mortgage debt in place – serves as a brilliant example of sophisticated distressed-debt investing in CMBS structures and a primer on how to fight and win “Tranche Warfare”.
 Continue Reading The Hancock Tower: A Distressed Debt Success Story?

FASB wants to expand Fair Value to other financial assets.  That bears repeating:  FASB has published an Exposure Draft that would extend the dubious joys of fair value accounting to ALL financial assets.  I so wish I was making this up.  On May 26, 2010, FASB published this missive. Fair Value seems to hold a religious (that’s born again, not Presbyterian) fascination for the academic accounting community, which seems astonishingly indifferent to the horrifying role the viciously pro-cyclical fair value process played in the late “Great Recession.”  Isn’t the definition of insanity doing something a second time and expecting a different outcome?  What are we doing here?

The proposed new rules would require all financial assets, with very few exceptions, to be subject to a mark to market  requirement.  Banks and other financial institutions would be obliged to mark all loans whether held for sale (which makes some sense) or held to maturity.  For loans, the mark would hit Other Consolidated Income (OCI) and put equity on the Fair Value roller coaster.

Continue Reading More From FASB

Do you have any idea how often each of the House and Senate reform bills proposes to solve an intractably complex problem by simply asking the regulators to come up with rules?  I don’t, but I found at least 20.  Now it all goes to reconciliation, and my suspicion is that that number will not go down and may, indeed, go up when our duly elected representatives throw up their hands, declare victory and make someone else figure it out.  Now, Congress asking our regulators to create rules to implement policy is nothing new, and there’s nothing wrong with it, if used sparingly.  But this is wholesale delegation of hugely important stuff.

Without clarity around the rules of the game, business will not thrive.  I keep coming back to this notion.  I run a business, and I need to figure out how financial markets will function coming out of the late unpleasantness.  It’s hard enough, but when the rules keep changing, it’s worse.Continue Reading Congress Kicks the Can Down the Road

We’ve been promised that the House and Senate financial reform bills will be reconciled in a highly transparent and thoughtful way and be wrapped up and ready for the President’s signature by Independence Day.

I’m trying to be upbeat about this.  There are, after all, substantial benefits to be obtained from certainty, and once this is done, we’ll at least have rules.  We may not like them, but at least we’ll have rules. (OK, the final Bill will probably include dozens of referrals to the regulatory community to make the actual rules, but nothing’s perfect.).  God only knows what to expect when our duly elected representatives, awash in populist outrage and with the clock ticking loudly down to election day, try their hands at making sense of these two ridiculously complicated 1,400 page bills.  Barney Frank will manage the reconciliation process.  Imagine, he has now been imbued with the hopes of the financial services community for a sensical and balanced Bill.  Man bites dog.  You can’t make this stuff up. Continue Reading Reconciliation Time on the Hill: Be Very Afraid

I write from CREFC’s annual do with my 800 or so best friends.  We are trying to party like it’s not 2009, and you know, we’re getting there.  The government’s still playing pin the tail on the regulatory donkey, Europe’s a mess, housing and employment are not ready for prime time, and the banking system hangover goes on.  Yet…JPM got a deal done, the bonds cleared, and pricing was… well, it’s been reported that they made a few bucks.

The CREFC convention kick off is the Monday night parties, of which yours truly was a host of the annual Dechert dinner.  Note I said parties with an “s”.  We’ve had a banker party drought these past few years. I see the return of the Street parties as a leading indicator of CMBS 2.0.  We cannot wish 2.0 into existence, but let’s face it:  A robust appetite for anything to invest in with yield measured in percentage points not basis points plus good vibes can a market revive.
 Continue Reading Partying Like it’s not 2009

This article was published by Matthew T. Clark and Stewart McQueen.

The 2010 CREFC Annual Convention has begun in earnest.  Day 1 began for many attendees with a meeting of the Securities and Loan Investors Forum.  This meeting included a lengthy discussion of the Fair Value Purchase Option and a perceived conflict of interest…

Last Friday I moderated a panel at the 11th Annual IMN Real Estate Opportunity and Private Investment Forum in New York.  The two-day event consisted of about 40 separate concurrent panels and drew over 800 industry participants.  The topics covered revolved around distressed debt investing – loan workouts, exit strategies, tranche warfare and distressed asset sales. 

My panel‘s topic was “Loan -To-Own” strategies.  Our conversation began with the panelists discussing the common characteristics of successful loan-to-own transactions.  The common areas of focus included the importance of stringent property-level due diligence, exacting legal due diligence with respect to loan documents, a realistic understanding of foreclosure processes and timeframes, accurate modeling of acquisition and stabilization costs, and the importance of the local expertise that can be gained from local developers and operators.Continue Reading Distressed Debt Conference

We’re looking forward to the 2010 June Convention of the Commercial Real Estate Finance Council (formerly the Commercial Mortgage Securities Association) next week at the Waldorf-Astoria in New York City.  From June 14th to 16th, over 700 lenders, borrowers, investors, fund managers, servicers, attorneys, and other industry participants will gather to discuss current topics in…

There’s a headline to grab attention. It’s been reported that several Chinese and other non-domestic and non-traditional lenders are rushing across the American landscape looking for deals. Take a look at the WSJ article of June 2 about the International & Commercial Bank of China’s recent loan to GE. ICBC has over a trillion dollars of assets, it’s reported to be the most profitable bank in the world and it’s ready to lend. Maybe this is just a “no duh” moment, but what a terrific business strategy for any lender not damaged by the late unpleasantness (a Southern expression still in use about the Civil War but appropriate here)! If the gnomes of Basal get their way and require US and European banks to put up massive capital over the next couple of years, strong, unimpaired semi-sovereign banks may be the best ticket in town.Continue Reading Chinese Banks Lend in the U.S.