Typically, from deal to deal, I don’t (and can’t imagine many of my colleagues do) get too worked up about Article 9 of the UCC…I know what it says, I know what to do, especially when it comes to creating and perfecting creditors’ security interests in collateral. But this year, I have reason to pause, as the 2010 Amendments to UCC Article 9, which have been adopted by more than 40 states (but not NY (and some others)—as of yet) went into effect on July 1, 2013.Continue Reading Brief Summary of Key UCC Article 9 Amendments Effective July 1, 2013
The Consequences of a Failed Banking Union
I told the Blog team that I had sworn off writing about Europe for a while; but really. The FT opinionized last week that the EU ministerial decision to agree on a standard “bail-in” to fix broken European banks was a good thing. The editorial ended with a ringing endorsement “something is, however, better than nothing.” Really? It reminds me of Wile E. Coyote bravely trying to use a handkerchief as a parachute as he falls off the butte, again. Beep, Beep.Continue Reading The Consequences of a Failed Banking Union
Why Does Everyone Want to Make Me Keep Thinking About Risk Retention
At last count, we now have four separate risk retention regimes (maybe five) that we need (or will soon need) to deal with as we attempt to restructure any securitization. They are, of course, all different. And let’s be crystal clear. This isn’t an issue for the distant future. Risk retention is here now and soon, much sooner than most think, it will become a front and center issue for all of us. We’ve written about skin in the game many times in the past (e.g., here, here and here), and I’m not going to re-litigate both the intellectual unsoundness of the notion and the negative impact on capital formation, but as we await developments, I thought it would be useful to compare and contrast the four variations on the theme and sound the heads up. It’s time for us to focus. Continue Reading Why Does Everyone Want to Make Me Keep Thinking About Risk Retention
Stormy Skies Greet Sunny Outlook at CREFC 2013
This week, over a thousand industry participants made their way through a rain soaked Manhattan for the start of CREFC’s Annual Conference. The low hum of attendees taking conference calls in corners and tapping messages on iphones provided a constant auditory backdrop to the event and aptly conveyed the velocity of the CMBS industry in 2013. The market is back to work.Continue Reading Stormy Skies Greet Sunny Outlook at CREFC 2013
Dechert’s OnPoint: Underwater Mortgages Deserve More than Eminent Domain
Mortgage Resolution Partners (“MRP”), a San Francisco-based venture-capital firm, continues to actively market its proposal to assist homeowners with underwater performing mortgage loans held in private label securitization by having such loans seized, refinanced, or restructured and sold to third party investors, with the government recovering the administration costs and MRP earning a fee on each transaction (the “Program”). For additional background information on MRP and the Program see here, here and here.Continue Reading Dechert’s OnPoint: Underwater Mortgages Deserve More than Eminent Domain
CREFC Returns to the Big Apple
Next week, hundreds of industry participants will make their way to New York for CREFC’s Annual Conference.
The conference promises to provide a forum to explore present and future market trends in commercial real estate, as well as an opportunity to gain valuable insight from many leaders in the market as to where we are and where we are headed. With panels such as “Lend-sanity: Competition Between Balance Sheet and Conduit Lenders” and “Borrowers: Is it their Game Now?”, it is clear there is no shortage of activity in commercial real estate, and there shouldn’t be any shortage of interest in this forum. The conference’s keynote address will come from Blackstone’s Global Head of Real Estate, Jonathon Gray, who will be sure to offer a unique viewpoint of the current and future landscape of real estate investments. Continue Reading CREFC Returns to the Big Apple
The Shadow Banking Market: The Shadow Knows
There’s a lot of talk these days about the growth of a shadow banking market. Shadow is right! The growth of the commercial lending market outside of the universe of insured depository institutions and life insurance companies is real and its growth is accelerating, yet it is not easy to discern its size, shape and taxonomy. The shadow banking market, which simply means the community of lenders outside of the bank and lifeco cadres, is a logical response to a worldwide tsunami of regulatory activity designed to constrain innumerable facets of financial institutions’ operations which often seems more about retribution than the safety, soundness or integrity of the financial markets life.Continue Reading The Shadow Banking Market: The Shadow Knows
On Appeal: The Michigan Court of Appeals Overturns It’s Prior Ruling and Affirms the State’s 2012 Legislation, Nonrecourse Mortgage Loan Act, Which Invalidates Recourse Carveout Guaranties Triggered by Borrower Insolvency
As we have discussed numerous times in this blog (here, here, here and here), the downturn in the commercial real estate market resulted in much litigation as to guarantor liability for non-recourse debt. As a brief refresher, many of the non-recourse loans made during the CMBS boom included an agreement that, in an event of default, the lender would only exercise remedies against the property securing the loan and not against the borrower (or its principals or sponsors), with an exception for certain borrower “bad-acts” (such as misappropriation of rents, fraud, and in certain instances, borrower bankruptcy or insolvency). In the event the borrower perpetuated any of these bad acts, the guarantor agreed to be liable either for the losses incurred by the lender, or for the full amount of the loan, depending on the bad act committed.Continue Reading On Appeal: The Michigan Court of Appeals Overturns It’s Prior Ruling and Affirms the State’s 2012 Legislation, Nonrecourse Mortgage Loan Act, Which Invalidates Recourse Carveout Guaranties Triggered by Borrower Insolvency
Ace in the Hole: NY Court Gives Hotel Owner New Way to Oust Hotel Manager and (Re)Claim Management of the Property
A recent decision of the New York state appellate court has given hotel owners a new way to override contract provisions in long-term property management agreements and oust hotel managers from managing the property. In Marriott Int’l, Inc., et al. v. Eden Roc, LLLP, 104 A.D.3d 583 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013), the appellate court vacated a lower court’s imposition of an injunction requiring Eden Roc, LLLP (“Eden Roc”), the hotel owner, to allow Renaissance Hotel Management Company, LLC (“Renaissance”), the (now former) hotel manager and subsidiary of Marriott International Inc. (“Marriott”), to perform its role as manager of the hotel in accordance with the management agreement.Continue Reading Ace in the Hole: NY Court Gives Hotel Owner New Way to Oust Hotel Manager and (Re)Claim Management of the Property
Undue Commercial Real Estate Risks Are Bad: The Mathematical Proof of the Blindingly Obvious
I was entertaining myself early this morning by looking over a joint agency report just released entitled “An Analysis of the Impact of the Commercial Real Estate Concentration Guidance”. This report summarizes the performance of bank CRE portfolios following the issuance of interagency guidance in 2006 entitled “Concentrations in Commercial Real Estate Lending, Sound Risk Management Practices”. Everyone will be shocked, shocked to know that through the course of the worst recession in post-war history, banks lost money because of commercial real estate exposure and many smaller and regional banks went casters up. Well, there’s startling news. We taxpayers pay for this sort of thing. Where is the sequester when we really need it?Continue Reading Undue Commercial Real Estate Risks Are Bad: The Mathematical Proof of the Blindingly Obvious