Commercial Mortgage Finance

Subscribe to Commercial Mortgage Finance via RSS

Terrorism insurance has been boring for the past several years. It risks becoming not boring. In the lee of the terrorism attack of 9/11, the Terrorism Risk Insurance Act, or TRIA, was rapidly passed by the Congress and signed by the President. TRIA provided a federal backstop for private terrorism insurance responding to the unwillingness of the private insurance market to provide meaningful terrorism insurance in light of the unpredictability of the risk and, therefore, perceived inability to price the insurance. TRIA was initially passed in November 2002 and reauthorized in 2005 and 2007. It expires on December 31, 2014. An extension is far from certain.Continue Reading Terrorism Insurance Redux

Last month, Federal District Court Judge Milton I. Shadur (a long-time Federal Judge and something of a legal legend in Illinois) held a guarantor liable for a deficiency claim brought in connection with a Georgia foreclosure – notwithstanding the fact that the deficiency could not be pursued under Georgia law. The case – Inland Mortgage Capital Corporation v. Chivas Retail Partners, LLC, et. al., Case No. 1:11-CV-06482 (N.D. Ill. 2012) – arose in connection with a defaulted construction loan relating to a retail shopping center outside of Atlanta and is the latest in a series of decisions shaping the legal landscape for guarantors of real estate loans.Continue Reading Caught up in a Waive: Federal Judge Holds Guarantor Liable for Disputed Deficiency

Do your mortgages in Indiana expressly state the maturity date of the secured obligation? If not, you better take action, quickly — especially for any mortgage loan that has been outstanding for at least 10 years. Earlier this year, the Indiana legislature enacted certain amendments to current Indiana law that may affect the duration of your mortgage liens. The impact of these amendments is to shorten the effectiveness of a mortgage lien on a recorded mortgage from 20 years to 10 years where the mortgage fails to state the maturity date. The amendments take effect July 1, 2012 and will apply to residential and commercial mortgages. Alarmingly, however, the amendments will even apply retroactively to mortgages recorded prior to July 1, 2012 which do not expressly state a maturity date.Continue Reading New Indiana Law May Terminate Certain Mortgage Liens This Sunday

Rialto Capital – Series 2012-LT1 is a done deal. It represents a huge innovation in commercial real estate structured finance. This is the first liquidating trust vehicle successfully securitized in the United States since the famous RTC N Series and its progeny of the mid-1990s. Briefly, the transaction involved the pooling of sub-performing, non-performing and REO assets pursuant to a plan to liquidate the assets in a measured but reasonably expeditious fashion. The sponsor holds the equity and a single class of debt was sold to investors. The deal has closed; the sponsor has stable, predictable match term financing.   Bond buyers got a transparent and robust structure with strong subordination, management and downside protection. A powerful new tool has been provided to the commercial mortgage finance industry.Continue Reading Innovation In Securitization Is Here: And It’s About Time!

Well, that didn’t take long . . . Flashback to last month, when we highlighted two eye-opening judicial decisions from Michigan that could potentially have a dramatic and costly impact for recourse guarantors of many CMBS loans.  The Cherryland and Chesterfield cases provoked widespread feelings of uncertainty and unease, as well as the belief that the courts had sacrificed the parties’ (and perhaps the entire industry’s) intent in exchange for a strict reading of the loan documents.  Despite the supposedly nonrecourse nature of the loans at issue, guarantors were faced with the possibility that they could be stuck with a whole lot of personal liability, simply because of a borrower’s inability to pay back its loan when due.  If upheld and looked to as persuasive authority in other jurisdictions, some believed the Michigan cases could run a wrecking ball through the foundation of American real estate finance.Continue Reading Michigan Legislature Proposes Bill in Response to Recourse Cases

Recently, several courts have published decisions interpreting the rights granted to mezzanine lenders under intercreditor agreements – I’ve recently co-authored this Dechert OnPoint detailing the cases. These decisions, in large part, follow the holding of the Stuytown decision (not great news for many subordinate lenders). Also, a recent decision from the United States Bankruptcy Court…

That great whooshing sound you heard a few weeks back may have been the air being sucked out of the room for thousands of warm bodies that penned recourse guaranties on (now) underwater loans during the market’s run-up. The cause: two recent cases coming out of Michigan (Wells Fargo Bank, NA v. Cherryland Mall and  51382 Gratiot Avenue Holdings v. Chesterfield Dev. Co.) sticking recourse guarantors with deficiency judgments on heretofore non-recourse loans based on the interplay of two fundamental tenets of CMBS lending – “bad boy” carve-outs and single purpose entity covenants.

Non-recourse lending is a lynchpin of American real estate finance. The lender is limited in the exercise of its remedies upon default to the collateral – for all intents and purposes, the Borrower gets a check at origination and a put at maturity should things go south. But there are limits – carve outs for fraud, selling the property, stealing rents, filing bankruptcy and other naughtiness will give the lender the right to look to the guarantor to make good on the loan.
 Continue Reading Pay Me My Money Down: Recourse Guarantors Pick Up the Tab in Michigan

Returning from a Labor Day weekend spent cleaning up after Irene, here are some notes as I clean out the desk drawer of Summer 2011: 

  • I spent the first week of August with my family on Martha’s Vineyard as the Dow Jones lost 1000 points, bond spreads blew out, securitized lending ground to a halt and the United States lost its triple-A credit rating. Past that, it seems the market held things together pretty well in my absence.
  • Not altogether unsurprising, but still notable that during the trading days following the U.S. downgrade, treasury yields decreased, leaving some doomsday investors scratching their heads. Of course, the thing about betting on the end of the world is that you can only be right once.
  • The third week of August saw the release of almost simultaneous reports that residential mortgage interest rates hit all-time lows and residential mortgage applications hit 15-year lows.
  • Meanwhile, the FHFA is suing 17 or so of the nation’s largest banks for billions in losses incurred during pre-bubble subprime securitizations. Many analysts are asking when (if?) the U.S. will stop punishing banks.

Continue Reading Summer Winds

This might not be man bites dog news, but in the structured finance world, it ranks pretty close. A U.S. bankruptcy court has ruled that a borrower can agree not to file bankruptcy.

It all starts with the development of a high-end condo project in Aspen, Colorado called Dancing Bear Aspen.

In December 2010, the Tenth Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel affirmed a Colorado bankruptcy court order granting a motion to dismiss a bankruptcy petition filed on behalf of DB Capital Holdings, LLC (the “Debtor”) which developed Dancing Bear Aspen. The Court affirmed the lower court’s finding that the Debtor’s LLC Operating Agreement expressly barred the Debtor from filing for bankruptcy.Continue Reading LLC Operating Agreement Prohibiting Bankruptcy Filing is Enforceable